K5CR7 Reviewing case information and justified conclusions personal learning checklist
WJEC Level 3 Applied Diploma in Criminology · Unit 3 · Internally assessed
Name ____________________ Class __________ Date __________
Tick one box per statement. Red: need help. Amber: partly confident. Green: can do independently.
| I can | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluating information and its origins | |||
| Examine case information using all five specified evaluative criteria | |||
| Evaluate provenance completeness and independent corroboration | |||
| Evidence transcripts media judgments and law reports | |||
| Examine physical digital and testimonial evidence against a disputed claim | |||
| Evaluate transcripts media accounts and their surrounding context | |||
| Examine judgments law reports and official summaries accurately | |||
| Drawing justified conclusions | |||
| Distinguish just safe and unsafe verdicts from factual innocence | |||
| Explain miscarriages of justice and separate statutory remedies | |||
| Assess sentencing justice using legally comparable outcomes | |||
| Weigh alternatives probability limits and interacting weaknesses | |||
| Verified cases and original review practice | |||
| Compare Clark Cannings and Birmingham Six through actual sources | |||
| Use Maxwell Horncastle and Jogee to justify different legal conclusions | |||
| Complete an independent source review without copying assessment answers | |||
Next revision priority: __________________________________________________